Erewash, in numbers

Your area: Erewash

Erewash local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Neighbourhood differences

Homes rented privately

8.4% to 29.6%

Homes rented privately ranged from 8.4% in Breaston to 29.6% in Derby Road East — a gap of 21.2 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Breaston	8.4%	165	1,970
Little Eaton & Stanley	8.7%	163	1,878
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	10.2%	275	2,701
Derby Road West	11.5%	341	2,967
Ockbrook & Borrowash	11.7%	367	3,149
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	11.9%	336	2,813
Sawley	12.1%	358	2,970
Shipley View	12.7%	254	2,007
Wilsthorpe	14.1%	460	3,252
Hallam Fields	15.3%	336	2,191
Sandiacre	15.8%	559	3,533
Cotmanhay	17.6%	395	2,243
Draycott & Risley	18.3%	349	1,911
Nottingham Road	18.9%	423	2,235
Awsworth Road	22.3%	526	2,355
Larklands	23.9%	950	3,973
Long Eaton Central	25.3%	901	3,559
Little Hallam	26.8%	569	2,124
Derby Road East	29.6%	743	2,511

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People reporting bad or very bad health

4.1% to 9.1%

People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 4.1% in Hallam Fields to 9.1% in Cotmanhay — a gap of 5.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Hallam Fields	4.1%	205	5,053
Wilsthorpe	4.3%	324	7,568
Shipley View	4.3%	206	4,794
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	4.5%	277	6,207
Draycott & Risley	4.5%	187	4,113
Breaston	4.7%	204	4,373
Little Eaton & Stanley	4.7%	207	4,359
Ockbrook & Borrowash	5.1%	365	7,165
Nottingham Road	5.1%	253	4,947
Derby Road East	5.1%	280	5,470
Sawley	5.7%	369	6,465
Sandiacre	5.7%	470	8,220
Little Hallam	5.8%	273	4,707
Derby Road West	6%	413	6,910
Larklands	6.4%	552	8,638
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	6.9%	441	6,407
Long Eaton Central	6.9%	502	7,282
Awsworth Road	7.6%	393	5,149
Cotmanhay	9.1%	464	5,079

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 65 or over

12.5% to 31.7%

People aged 65 or over ranged from 12.5% in Hallam Fields to 31.7% in Breaston — a gap of 19.2 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Hallam Fields	12.5%	629	5,051
Derby Road East	13.4%	732	5,469
Awsworth Road	16%	826	5,149
Wilsthorpe	17.5%	1,325	7,567
Long Eaton Central	17.8%	1,297	7,282
Larklands	18.1%	1,567	8,637
Nottingham Road	19.5%	962	4,945
Shipley View	19.6%	938	4,796
Cotmanhay	19.7%	1,001	5,081
Sandiacre	20.3%	1,672	8,218
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	21.6%	1,387	6,407
Little Hallam	21.9%	1,031	4,708
Draycott & Risley	22.2%	911	4,111
Sawley	23.2%	1,500	6,467
Derby Road West	23.6%	1,631	6,913
Ockbrook & Borrowash	24.3%	1,744	7,164
Little Eaton & Stanley	27.3%	1,190	4,360
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	28.4%	1,764	6,205
Breaston	31.7%	1,384	4,366

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

14.7% to 29.2%

People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 14.7% in Little Eaton & Stanley to 29.2% in Cotmanhay — a gap of 14.5 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Little Eaton & Stanley	14.7%	545	3,697
Breaston	15.7%	585	3,726
Wilsthorpe	15.7%	978	6,219
Ockbrook & Borrowash	15.9%	949	5,976
Shipley View	16.4%	671	4,084
Draycott & Risley	17%	596	3,516
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	17.1%	902	5,282
Hallam Fields	17.3%	709	4,089
Derby Road East	17.9%	797	4,457
Nottingham Road	18.6%	757	4,072
Sandiacre	19.9%	1,330	6,697
Derby Road West	20%	1,144	5,714
Long Eaton Central	20.4%	1,244	6,108
Little Hallam	20.6%	819	3,978
Sawley	21.6%	1,163	5,396
Larklands	24.8%	1,760	7,090
Awsworth Road	25%	1,036	4,143
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	26%	1,365	5,245
Cotmanhay	29.2%	1,179	4,038

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

16.2% to 38.5%

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 16.2% in Cotmanhay to 38.5% in Little Eaton & Stanley — a gap of 22.3 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Cotmanhay	16.2%	655	4,038
Awsworth Road	16.8%	698	4,143
Larklands	17.8%	1,265	7,090
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	18.3%	961	5,245
Little Hallam	23.4%	930	3,978
Long Eaton Central	24.2%	1,481	6,108
Sawley	24.3%	1,310	5,396
Shipley View	24.6%	1,005	4,084
Hallam Fields	24.8%	1,015	4,089
Sandiacre	25.3%	1,695	6,697
Nottingham Road	27.4%	1,117	4,072
Wilsthorpe	28.2%	1,753	6,219
Derby Road East	28.3%	1,261	4,457
Derby Road West	29%	1,658	5,714
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	29.8%	1,576	5,282
Draycott & Risley	31.3%	1,101	3,516
Ockbrook & Borrowash	33.2%	1,984	5,976
Breaston	35.2%	1,313	3,726
Little Eaton & Stanley	38.5%	1,424	3,697

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

12.3% to 29.8%

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 12.3% in Little Eaton & Stanley to 29.8% in Cotmanhay — a gap of 17.6 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Little Eaton & Stanley	12.3%	230	1,877
Breaston	12.6%	249	1,970
Shipley View	12.8%	256	2,002
Wilsthorpe	12.9%	420	3,253
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	12.9%	349	2,699
Draycott & Risley	13.7%	261	1,911
Ockbrook & Borrowash	13.9%	437	3,149
Hallam Fields	15%	328	2,192
Little Hallam	17%	362	2,124
Nottingham Road	17.2%	384	2,235
Sandiacre	17.3%	613	3,534
Derby Road East	18%	451	2,509
Derby Road West	18.4%	546	2,968
Sawley	19.9%	591	2,970
Long Eaton Central	20.3%	721	3,559
Larklands	22.6%	899	3,972
Awsworth Road	25.1%	589	2,349
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	26.4%	742	2,815
Cotmanhay	29.8%	669	2,244

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

2.3% to 31.4%

Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 2.3% in Shipley View to 31.4% in Cotmanhay — a gap of 29.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 19 of 19 current wards with comparable figures.

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Shipley View	2.3%	46	2,007
Little Hallam	5.3%	112	2,124
West Hallam & Dale Abbey	6.4%	172	2,701
Breaston	7.3%	143	1,970
Wilsthorpe	7.3%	239	3,252
Nottingham Road	8.1%	180	2,235
Hallam Fields	8.2%	179	2,191
Little Eaton & Stanley	8.4%	157	1,878
Derby Road East	9.8%	245	2,511
Ockbrook & Borrowash	10.3%	325	3,149
Draycott & Risley	11.7%	224	1,911
Sandiacre	12.8%	452	3,533
Larklands	14.1%	562	3,973
Derby Road West	15%	444	2,967
Long Eaton Central	15.3%	544	3,559
Sawley	17.2%	511	2,970
Awsworth Road	21.4%	503	2,355
Kirk Hallam & Stanton-by-Dale	23.6%	663	2,813
Cotmanhay	31.4%	705	2,243

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

19 mapped electoral wards · May 2026. The same wards are available in the named list below. These are council boundaries, not police neighbourhoods.

Choose a ward

These are electoral wards or the explicitly labelled statistical equivalents. They do not necessarily match villages, parishes or police neighbourhoods.